《浅析BBS文学版块的生存与发展》读后感 读后感作文
自从接触网络，便开始在各种个样的论坛上来回的溜达，在网上溜达的时间久了，看的多了，也就从过去的浮躁，爱凑热闹，转为现今的只寻僻静地落脚的习惯。《 梧桐 花瓣 雨》版块我是从来没有来过的，今天也是看了《浅析BBS文学版块的生存与发展》这篇文章才走进这里。来西祠落脚也就这几天的时间。原来也来过，但一直是匆匆的过客，从未想过在这里停留。其中最大的原因就是这里看似太繁华热闹，给人一种无所适从的感觉。因此，总是在这样的喧嚣面前落荒而逃。
现在说正题。在各种论坛做斑竹的经历使我最终选择了做文学版块的斑竹。开始的时候，真的是信心百倍，大有不把版块搞上去不罢休的意思。
然而，一段时间做下来之后，才发现，想把一些纯文学的东西搞的象无主题版块那样的红火简直是天方夜谭。究其原因，无非是浮躁和心态的问题。上网的人是越来越多了，写东西的人也是很不少。但是，更多的人把自己的作品发在论坛上的目的绝对不是为了孤芳自赏，而是为了得到大家的认可和共鸣，希望能被更多的人所接受。而纯文学的版块犯的通病就是，看的人多，回应的人少，甚至根本不看别人的东西，却期望能从别人那里得到回报。这样的眼高手低的恶性循环，最终导致了版块越来越冷清。太过冷清的版块是留不住人的。我相信每个写手的文章写出来肯定都不会仅仅是贴在那里就了事，而是希望能看到大家的积极回复。长久的冷清注定要打消写手的积极性，致使一些好的写手离此而去。而版块也将会因为这样的恶性循环而更加的冷清。
那么，为什么文学版块就留不住人呢？我想，无非是因为曲高和寡的缘故。更多的来论坛闲逛的朋友他们不一定是好的写手，但，他们需要通过论坛来进行交流。于是，他们会选择那些主题性不是很强的版块停留，在那里戏水玩乐，释放一下在现实生活中集结的一些心情，没有其他更高的欲望，只图个在网上随心所欲，轻松快乐。这是文学版块所无法带给他们的。因此，他们会远离文学版块只为灌水而灌水。当这样灌水的人更多的聚在一起的时候，一些写手便也很自然的转到了这样的版块中去了。虽然，在那里，他的文章发出来可能会没有一个人认真的去看，但是，却能得到大家很积极热情的回复，尽管那样的回复离题万里，但是，毕竟点击率和回复率是上去了，这多少对写手也是一种认同和鼓励，让写手的小小的虚荣心得到一些满足。这样的环境虽然不可能长期的留住那些真正的写手，但是，会吸引更多的写手的光顾，形成一种良性的循环状态。这也是这样的版块同纯文学版块最根本的区别。
正是因为有了这样的区别，纯文学的版块永远也别指望能同那些以灌水为主的版块在人气上一争高低。但是，这就又回到了老话题上了，没有人气的版块是留不住人的。这是个很值得深思的问题，那么，我们怎样才能使我们的文学版块既不沦为灌水版，又能凝聚人气呢？我个人认为，没有什么捷径可走，首先，斑竹要勤快，网友可以懒散不回帖，斑竹却绝对不能那样。至少，斑竹要保证自己的版块内不存在无人回复的帖子的存在，这无形中对写手是个鼓励。我就常这样对自己说，一篇文章发出来，能有一个人认真的看了，也就值得了。所以，能有一个人认真的看，认真的回复，我觉得那是一个写手能承受的最低的底线。其次，应该带动版块里有时间的写手积极的参与回复，这样，有助于大家的沟通和为版块创造良好的写作环境。我个人认为，没有一个写手是真正希望自己写的东西无人看，无人回复的。
我曾经写过这样两篇文章《有一种风情叫卖弄》，《我的文字勾引了你》。就是对写手心态的一种诠释。我将随即发在这里与朋友们讨论。
以上，是长期以来的困扰，说起来容易做起来难。人浮于事这样的大环境不是靠一个人一朝一夕就能改变的。关键的一点是，首先我们这些做论坛的不能灰心泄气。坚持也是一种必须。坚持到最后，哪怕真的以失败而告终，我们毕竟是努力过了，只要还有最后一个网友在，我觉得就不应该选择放弃。
英文读后感 To Regain the Nature of Goodness
To Regain the Nature of Goodness—— Review of ‘Oliver Twist’顾竹屹 上海市实验学校高三（1）班 阅读书目：雾都孤儿 Oliver Twist （书虫· 牛津英汉双语读物）
Oliver Twist, one of the most famous works of Charles Dickens’, is a novel reflecting the tragic fact of the life in Britain in 18th century.
The author who himself was born in a poor family wrote this novel in his twenties with a view to reveal the ugly masks of those cruel criminals and to expose the horror and violence hidden underneath the narrow and dirty streets in London.
The hero of this novel was Oliver Twist, an orphan, who was thrown into a world full of poverty and crime. He suffered enormous pain, such as hunger, thirst, beating and abuse. While reading the tragic experiences of the little Oliver, I was shocked by his sufferings. I felt for the poor boy, but at the same time I detested the evil Fagin and the brutal Bill. To my relief, as was written in all the best stories, the goodness eventually conquered devil and Oliver lived a happy life in the end. One of the plots that attracted me most is that after the theft, little Oliver was allowed to recover in the kind care of Mrs. Maylie and Rose and began a new life. He went for walks with them, or Rose read to him, and he worked hard at his lessons. He felt as if he had left behind forever the world of crime and hardship and poverty.
How can such a little boy who had already suffered oppressive affliction remain pure in body and mind? The reason is the nature of goodness. I think it is the most important information implied in the novel by Dickens—he believed that goodness could conquer every difficulty. Although I don’t think goodness is omnipotent, yet I do believe that those who are kind-hearted live more happily than those who are evil-minded.
For me, the nature of goodness is one of the most necessary character for a person. Goodness is to humans what water is to fish. He who is without goodness is an utterly worthless person. On the contrary, as the famous saying goes, ‘The fragrance always stays in the hand that gives the rose’, he who is with goodness undoubtedly is a happy and useful person. People receiving his help are grateful to him and he also gets gratified from what he has done, and thus he can do good to both the people he has helped and himself.
To my disappointment, nowadays some people seem to doubt the existence of the goodness in humanity. They look down on people’s honesty and kindness, thinking it foolish of people to be warm-hearted. As a result, they show no sympathy to those who are in trouble and seldom offer to help others. On the other hand, they attach importance to money and benefit. In their opinion, money is the only real object while emotions and morality are nihility. If they cannot get profit from showing their ‘kindness’, they draw back when others are faced with trouble and even hit a man when he is down. They are one of the sorts that I really detest.
Francis Bacon said in his essay, ‘Goodness, of all virtues and dignities of the mind, is the greatest, being the character of the Deity, and without it, man is a busy, mischievous, wretched thing, no better than a kind of vermin.’
That is to say a person without goodness is destined to lose everything. Therefore, I, a kind person, want to tell those ‘vermin-to-be’ to learn from the kind Oliver and regain the nature of goodness.
