英文读后感 To Be Or Not To Be, That Is the Question 读后感作文
段 旭 北京市丰台区长辛店北京十中高三 阅读书目：星际动物园 The Star Zoo （书虫· 牛津英汉双语读物）
As the only living things on a bare planet called “Just Like Home”, humans felt lonely and sad. In order to live, they must get married as often as possible and have children. Unwilling to get married, our 16-year-old protagonist named Humming Bird ran away from her planet and found a plastic space ship. There she met various kinds of animals, which frightened her even drove her crazy. She had never seen such things before. Only through ‘The Book Of Remembering’ did she get some rough idea of animals. After she took a small-copied cat home and showed it to the officials on her planet, the cat was shot to death and all the officials went crazy. Humming Brid didn’t give up her attempt to let people accept the animals. She decided to set about the job from children…
That’s the brief plot of Harry Gilbert’s science fiction—<The Star Zoo>. Based on the reality of increasing environmental problems, the writer uses his full imagination and creativity to produce this vivid imaginative and thought-provoking story.
As far as we know, animal numbers are now diminishing all over the world every years, and the living conditions we depend on a getting worse. We dirty the air with gases and smoke, poison the water with chemicals and other substances and damage the soil with too many fertilizers and pesticides. We also pollute our surroundings in many other ways. Air, water and soil are all very important and necessary to the survival of all living things all over the world. If we human don’t pay more attention to that, there will come a day when we have to live the kind of life described in this novel. As we know, the world is made up not only of human beings but also a lot of other living things. If we don’t want to leave this perfect planet, we have to protect the environment; otherwise, without the company of other living things, people would only be half-alive, men only half-men.
Nowadays, I should say, people have realized the importance of environmental protection and ecological balance. Slogans that remind us to save water and electricity are stuck everywhere, but how many are treated as requirements or duties and not just a piece of paper. If we pay a little attention to our working and study places, we always find some taps half opened with running water, and large numbers of people get used to leave lights on during the day. Dustbins for both recycled and unredeemable rubbish are placed in high density but no one bothers to throw the rubbish into the right dustbins. Nor do they even know what kind of rubbish could be recycled and what kind could not.
Conservation centers for protecting animals are built in many countries. Our government also passed some acts to protect animals; however, there do exist some law-breakers who are driven by money. We plant trees very year, but no one bothers to water and care for them after planting them. For money, some farmers drive their sheep and cattle to grasslands and charge it into desert.
All in all, to every one, I want to say, “Living on this wonderful planet earth, we are lucky and happy. In order to enjoy this kind of wonderful life, we must care for mother earth and put this kind of care into practice.”
Facing the world, to be or not to be, it’s up to you. We must make a choice without any hesitation!
《英雄》观后感
对于《英雄》这部电影，我想开门见山的说：好，但只差一点！先说几句谦虚的话，本人不是电影的内行，对于影片的什么拍摄呀、服装呀、武美呀不是很懂，所以也就不想在这些方面丢人了。
——好！好在哪里，我有这样一个理由。
有句话叫：作品出来以后就不再是作者的作品。还有句话说：作者已死，读者万岁。我在这里也想发扬一下这样的“精神”，谈谈我个人的看法。
表面看来，这部电影好象是部现代人理念里的“刺客列传”，在我这看则不竟然。以我个人的看法，侠和刺客在影片的地位就是一个符号，导演是借了这个符号在给另一批人做传。
真正的“英雄”是谁？影片中回答的很清楚，心怀天下者乃真英雄！
那谁又真正做到了心怀天下呢？翻翻中国的历史，把天下怀成影片中描述的那样的只有一个群体——知识份子阶层！
对！在我眼里，这部影片好就好在：张导演借“侠”为中国的知识份子做了个很悲剧的传！中国有句老话：侠以武乱法，儒以文干政。
在该片中武侠符号后的人就是“儒”，也就是我说的知识份子阶层。心怀天下可以说是中国知识份子阶层的一个共性，远的不说，近代的仁人志士哪个不是出自这个阶层。康梁变法、科学救国、甚至后来的两弹一星等等，多少知识分子把捐弃个人做为代价换来一个心怀天下的美名！个人在天下的眼里是渺小的，甚至在知识分子个人的眼里也是渺小的，为了天下，个人是最不足惜的。
当然，中国还有句话说：天下兴亡，匹夫有责。那是不是按这个前提推理，匹夫们也是英雄了呢？
我想先阐述一下我的对匹夫的个人理解。大体上说人分这几类：当权者、无知匹夫和知识分子。我节外生枝的说明一下，三者之间可以不是截然对立，当权者可以下台成匹夫或是知识分子、匹夫也可以混进知识分子和当权者的队伍。
匹夫即百姓，也就是天下中最最最无辜而且总是被践踏的人。这些人是兴亡的主体，但对兴亡无责。当权者弄天下，也对天下兴亡不感兴趣。惟有知识分子这个“不识时务”的群体对天下的兴亡念念不忘，说“天下兴亡、匹夫有责”的绝对是个知识分子而不是真匹夫！
能为知识分子做传做的这么好、挖掘的这么深的影片我觉得是好影片、至少是个我这样的人看的比较顺眼的影片。
可是，就象我题目说的那样——好，但只差一点！差哪一点呢？
个人以为，学学影片中的台词，它高“看”了一个人——秦王！
如果，影片老老实实的写出秦王这两个字，它就一点都不差了。可是，它画蛇添足的给王字加了个点：王成了主。差就差在这一点上了！
又回到我刚才说过的那句话上去：天下兴亡、匹夫有责。何为责，义务也！政治课本上早就说过，有权就有责，那反过来有责就意味着有权，至少是“应该”有权。
假设一下，“匹夫有责”这句话要是正确的话。那么，匹夫有了责也就应该有权，而“责”是天下这么大的责，那“权”也应该是天下这么大权。
汉字造的非常漂亮，一个“王”字、一个“主”字，不少就差一点。正常的逻辑是，循序渐进，那就先王而后主。如果不能王，当然就没有办法主了。
——那我们就先来看看这些王
《庄子.杂篇》第一论“庚桑楚”里阐述了这样一个观点：天下乱，因为谁？不单因为有桀、有纣这样的暴君、也是因为有秦皇、汉武和“鸟生鱼汤”！
我想把这个观点再推大一点，天下乱，除了权者弄权而坏天下之和谐，更因为人人都想成为“主”。在这种利益驱使下人人都想通过先“王”的方法而后“主”，天下人心乱、则天下自然就乱。
——所以乱在何处，乱在人心！
前面我提到过，张导演为知识分子的悲剧作传，让我觉得顺眼，现在我要解释这句话中的另外两个字——悲剧。
知识分子们傻傻的为天下匹夫舍生取义，希望能够平“兼济天下”、“平天下”，可是，他们轻信了弄权的王、怜悯着想通过先王而后主的乱之源头匹夫，即百姓。如此南辕北辙、轻生取义，可怜又可笑，当悲剧二字无愧！
所以说《英雄》好，但只差一点！
——最后说一句，行文混乱希望大家谅解！
